![]() |
|
|
|
The Price Of ‘Confidence’ Wall Street bounded back on sheer hope that the G-7 would finally fix the problem. But by my count we’re waking up some $7 trillion poorer than we were before the banks threw their panic tantrum. And this is just the down payment on the new trick mortgage they’re selling America. Wait until you hear what they plan to do with the free money from Uncle Sam... George Orwell is smiling from his grave.
Now we have yet another government minister added to the pantheon—the Secretary of Financial Stability. His Job? Supervise the largest tax hike ever seen in the history of the world to repay insolvent banks for the appalling losses they gambled away with irresponsible lending, and massively over leveraged derivatives schemes. The first hundred billion gets doled out to the top four US banks. BofA, Morgan Chase, CitiGroup, and Wells Fargo each get a nice piece of candy in their trick or treat bag this October--a cool $25 billion. Where does this money come from? You and me…the fabled “Joe Sixpacks” and the “Hockey Moms” Sarah Palin was flirtatiously winking and nodding at all through her storied debate. (Could any male VP candidate get away with those sexy little smiles and winks in a national election?) Michael Hudson illustrated just how anemic the supposed government hold on the banks is in this deal: “Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s first option was to buy packages of junk mortgages (collateralized debt obligations, CDOs) to save the wealthiest institutional investors from having to take a loss on their bad bets. When this was not enough, he came up with “Plan B,” to give money to banks. But whereas Britain and European countries talked of nationalizing banks or at least taking a controlling interest, Mr. Paulson gave in to his Wall Street cronies and promised that the government’s stock purchases would not be real. There would be no dilution of existing shareholders, and the government’s investment would be non-voting. To cap the giveaway to his cronies, Mr. Paulson even agreed not to ask executives to give up their golden parachutes, exorbitant annual bonuses or salaries.” The Western industrialized nations have now been forced to levy a three trillion dollar tax on their citizenry to pay off the bankers’ collective bad debt so they can “recapitalize” and start the game over again. And believe me, with $600 + trillion in derivatives out there, this is just the down payment. That was the price of restoring “confidence” in our financial system. That’s what it will take to get the assholes to start lending again. Or will they? Read on to see what else they have planned for the free handout from the government. Joe Nocera of the New York Times
shined a little light on the new plans being hatched in the boardrooms of big banks who received a free check for $25 billion from Paulson to “recapitalize” so they can start lending again. “In point of fact, the dirty little secret of the banking industry is that it has no intention of using the money to make new loans.,” Nocera reported. After obtaining a copy of a conference call made by JP Morgan Chase executives. The call was very revealing of the bank’s real intentions for using the $25 billion it just received from taxpayers: “What we do think it will help us do is perhaps be a little bit more active on the acquisition side or opportunistic side for some banks who are still struggling... and I think we have an opportunity to use that $25 billion in that way ...We would think that loan volume will continue to go down as we continue to tighten credit to fully reflect the high cost of pricing on the loan side.” Nocera concluded: “Read that answer as many times as you want — you are not going to find a single word in there about making loans to help the American economy. In other words JPMorgan has no intention of turning on the lending spigot.” Naomi Klein of the UK Guardian had this assessment: “Meanwhile, every day it becomes clearer that the bail-out was sold to the public on false pretenses. Clearly, it was never really about getting loans flowing. It was always about doing what it is doing: turning the state into a giant insurance agency for Wall Street, a safety net for the people who need it least, subsidized by the people who will most need state protections in the economic storms ahead.” Times reporter Nocera went to Finance Committee Chair Senator Dodd and asked him what would happen if the banks just sit on their free government cash. According to Nocera, Dodd seemed to echo the quote I presented from Henry Ford and replied: “If it turns out that they are hoarding, you’ll have a revolution on your hands. People will be so livid and furious that their tax money is going to line their pockets instead of doing the right thing. There will be hell to pay.” The gist of the Nocera article was that Paulson may have actually intended the banks to use the money for new acquisitions, so they can continue gobbling up weaker institutions and take that problem off the FDIC balance sheet. WaMu, for example, could have wiped out the FDIC had it not been gobbled up by JP Morgan/Chase. Analyst Mike Shedlock disagrees with this conclusion, and to him it is this simple: “The economic constraints and poor policy decisions by the Fed and Treasury make mergers a better alternative than lending money or sitting in cash.” But the point remains--the banks take public money and do what is in their best interest with it. They do not do what is in the nation’s best interest, or the people’s best interest, and the government got very little in return for the cash. Stock? We paid $125 billion for stock that we could have bought for less than half that at current prices. All the stock Uncle Sam got could have been purchased for $62 billion. Aldous Huxley predicted the consequences of this upward movement of wealth and power in his book Brave New World Revisited: “Democracy” argued Huxley, “can hardly be expected to flourish in societies where political and economic power is being progressively concentrated and centralized…Big Man gobbles up Little Man…and as Little Men disappear, more and more economic power comes to be wielded by fewer and fewer people. The Power Elite of the Brave New World directly employs millions of the country’s working force in its factories, offices and stores, controls many millions more by lending them the money to buy its products, and through ownership of the media of mass communication, influences the thoughts, the feelings and the actions of virtually everybody.” Those words were written in the 1950s. Now to restore “confidence in the markets,” the price will be enormously high, but I’m inclined to think the effort is more to restore the same old game that relied on that confidence. Bernanke and Paulson are trying to fight fire with fire. The problem before us now was created by loose credit policies that led to a wild spate of irresponsible lending by the banks. In short, the problem was too much credit posing as real wealth and creating the illusion that we were in a productive, growing economy. When you simply create money and credit from thin air, as opposed to basing it on something real produced and saved in the economy, you get this fantasy of pixelated wealth that has been driving the nation for the last decade. Once that broke down, as it simply had to break down, the Fed launched itself on a mission to restore the status quo by pumping out more and more artificially created dollars into the system. They want the banks to lend again, or so they say, and to continue shoveling out credit, (which is really just debt), to try and restart the game. Steve Saville put it this way in a recent article You Can’t Get Something For Nothing,: - “Now that the investment boom has gone bust and the necessary adjustment process has begun, we are being told incessantly that the solution to the problems caused by massive increases in the supplies of money and credit is additional massive increases in the supplies of money and credit.” Runaway consumption based on easy credit was the problem. How can it be corrected by trying to stimulate yet more consumption based on credit? Americans were spending 125% of their annual income each year! They were pulling massive chunks of phantom “equity” out of homes that were outrageously overvalued by pure speculation and loose lending. The rest was being spent on rivers of revolving credit. The real savings rate of Americans is now negative. Saville concludes that: “an increase in production must precede a sustained increase in consumption; that saving is the basis of long-term economic growth; that no individual can become rich by spending more than he earns; and that no country can become wealthy, or recover from a recession, by consuming more than it produces. And yet, most commentators have deluded themselves into believing that you can get around the problem of inadequate real savings by simply increasing the supply of the medium of exchange, (printed dollars), and that you can bypass the need for increased consumption to be funded by increased production by simply getting the government to spend like a drunken sailor.” Nothing is really being done to correct the core problem, which lies in the creation of the Fed, its fiat currency, and the whole system of fractional reserve lending and leveraged securities trading. The only real medicine for the crisis at hand is to suffer the pain of deleveraging and down-scaling to a sustainable life style. People have to stop heedless spending. They have to start living within their means and building real savings. The country has to transition from phantom digital wealth back to wealth based on production of real things. The factories have to start being built here instead of in China and Mexico. The jobs have to return to American shores, providing real productive economic activity to this nation, not a game of guess the new price on “Flip That House.” Yet all Bernanke and Paulson are trying to do now is fill the vast negative hole of eroding confidence and evaporating equity with more printed money. Confidence is required if the old scam is ever to work again, because confidence in the system is nothing more than getting people to believe this fraudulent activity is legitimate. It is a distracting sleight of hand while the financial magicians steal the public deaf, dumb and blind...and it has to be paid for. That is the great sadness in all of this--in spite of the catastrophic news that has shaken our system to its foundation, we seem to have learned nothing. The effort now is not to reform, renew and rebuild, but to simply restore the old status quo and keep the gambling game going. The house is simply doling out stacks of new chips and changing the rules at the gambling tables to make them more attractive. Worse than this is the simple fact that the banks will just use the bailout money to fatten their acquisitions schedule. It will only postpone the real “crisis” a few years. Eventually all books, in both accounting and in nature, must be balanced. The Hidden Price of “Confidence” The gentlemen in their suits wanted more money. They will get more money, one way or another, and Joe Sixpack and all the Hockey Moms will pay for it in two ways—the same ways that governments get their money—through taxes and printing, which will eventually debase the currency. Initially the cash will be raised by the sale of Treasuries, which is just more government debt. But what happens when the buyers thin out? The printing press is standing by for heavy action. Who’s going to restore our confidence? Who is really going to help all the Joe Sixpacks and Soccer Moms, all the pensioners and retirees that have yet to fully realize they are 30% poorer now than they were just a few months ago? We got a break in gasoline prices in recent months, just like we always do before an election, but all the other price hikes are taking some time to cool off. Are rents coming down? Have they ever come down? Are medical costs coming down? Not only is the Bernanke/Paulson plan of reinflating credit wrong, its aimed at the wrong end of the system. You want to kick the economy into high gear? Take the trillions now being thrown into the derivatives black hole and distribute it to the people instead. The money just vanishes into a digital balance sheet when given away at the top. Give it to Main Street and people will spend again in no time flat. Not a paltry $300 check either--the trillions involved would give every American family at least $10,000, and a nice fat check for ten grand would make a huge difference in most family budgets. It would wipe out most of their credit card debt, for starters. But don’t expect Paulson and Bernanke to advocate that any time soon. (Credit card debt is the #1 profit center in any bank.) Nope. That money, all nice and clean and freshly minted, goes to the bankers. You wait in line and see how hard it’s going to be to wrangle for a loan in the years ahead. Believe me, you will soon agree with the rest of the ever sickening national body…Sometimes the bank can be a real asshole. But realistically, we cannot spend our way out of this problem any more than we can drill our way out of our energy situation. Each dollar created lessens the value of every other dollar in circulation. That’s simple math. So Paulson and Bernanke should not be cutting those $10,000 checks to all the Joe Sixpacks out there--but neither should they be doling it out to the banks! Bloomberg ran this incredibly stupid headline on Oct 22nd: “Turmoil May Make Americans Savers, Worsening Nasty Recession.” The point of the article was that the businesses that depend upon the rapacious American consumer were
going to have to down-size now, or go under. Yes. They will. It’s time we admitted it. We have to face it: time to deleverage our lives at every level, from the bank balance sheets, to corporate books, to the daily
budgets of Joe Sixpack. Time to take our medicine now. It will all come back to us again when we start spending money on real things that matter in this country. We need a new rail system, and light rail for
public transport in every major population center. We don’t need more Wal-Marts, Home Depots, and strip malls selling landfill fodder. We need a massive investment in alternative energy systems aimed at
decentralizing energy production and distribution. We need real affordable medical care for our rapidly aging population. Will President Obama be able to actually turn the rudder on this sinking ship when he gets his
hand on the wheel? (And it will be President Obama, without question.) The mud slinging Republican campaign, fired by the largely conservative radio talk shows, would have us
believe that by voting Obama we will actually be electing the Reverend Jeremiah as the featured guest singer with Ayers and his Weatherman as a backup band, (forgetting Obama was a teenager when Ayers
last made any news). They would have us believe Obama is more loyal to Kenya than the US, that his middle name is Hussein, which means he’s an Arab terrorist. One right wing blog ran an article that he was
secretly using waking hypnosis techniques in his speech patterns. And the radio hosts like Rusty Humphry and others are all starting to play their last desperate card now, claiming that “new evidence” has
emerged to prove Obama wasn’t born in the US and is not actually a citizen--forgetting the fact that his mother was a US citizen, so that makes him a US citizen no matter where he was born.. Gawd... Note to
deluded, uninformed, easily duped, and incredibly naive would be voters who believe any of this nonsense—the only terrorists we have ever had in the White House are there now, and thank god the
eviction notice is finally being nailed to the door. Article by: John Schettler – Oct, 2008 |
|
|